Explanation of the book
This book is an important contribution to one of the topics of the principles of Islamic jurisprudence. It studies the emergence of the idea of consensus, the authority of consensus, and the positions of jurists and thinkers on the validity of consensus. It is also an attempt to criticize the basis on the basis of reviewing its functions. The author presents a bold critique of consensus based on Islamic references that criticized its political and social function. The author concludes that the characteristics inherent in consensus are past-centeredness, centralism, and exclusion.
Section: Political books
Number of pages: 336 pages
This book is an important contribution to one of the topics of the principles of Islamic jurisprudence. It studies the emergence of the idea of consensus, the authority of consensus, and the positions of jurists and thinkers on the validity of consensus. It is also an attempt to criticize the basis on the basis of reviewing its functions. The author presents a bold critique of consensus based on Islamic references that criticized its political and social function. The author concludes that the characteristics inherent in consensus are past-centeredness, centralism, and exclusion.
A critical review of the consensus between theory and practice
139 kr