Ibn Taymiyyah's critique is not so much the pinnacle of a tradition of anti-logical rhetoric as an innovative and creative selection of already existing but divergent arguments. It is not the pinnacle of a tradition because there is no such definite tradition that can be plausibly defined in terms of genre, movement, and direction. Undoubtedly, Ibn Taymiyyah approached the problem with his own intellectual framework derived from and based on his own concepts directly. This criticism is completely imbued with a special timid methodology and epistemology